Citadel Community

note; dunno if I've screwed the format up

BYOND Name:saintjohn

Reason Banned:metacomming

Admin who banned:'Lordheichou'

Length Banned:Permanent

Appeal Reason:all I metacommed for was when we got bwoinked, generally I don't meta, this was also a first time offense, and can't remember being warned seriously or even the last time I got bwoinked.

Just to be clear, you admit to metacomming?

Mate, you clearly admitted to metacomms both in ahelps, the discord, and here too. Metacommunication is against server rules and we punish it harshly. You already had a note warning about metacomms. You also didn't put in your appeal the ban reason I put in your ban.

I mean, sure id understand a day, even a week, but holy shit permanently? really? for asking my man to deal with the bwoink? seems a bit steep. Also this is my first appeal, gimme a break.

I said we punish metacomms severely.

Uh-huh, yeah I read that. Is permanent not too severe though? Also how old is that note? I remember fucking around 2-3 years ago so is that what the note is?

The only thing too severe here is how lacking your appeal reason is, the lack of a proper, or even attempt at a proper thread title, and the amount of your ban reason you couldn't put the effort into copy-pasting and instead paraphrasing it by tossing out 99% of the actual reason.

Eh, that kinda worked I guess? As previously stated I was generally unsure how you were meant to fully lay it out, so I just went with 'metacomms.'
Honestly couldn't give a shit if im banned for a length of time, be it days, weeks or months, just don't want a permanent ban.

Another thing, the entire point of this is mainly to dispute the fact that asking my friend to 'deal with a bwoink' is far less related to the round than if I were to be in a voice chat and tell him to kill such and such, etc. As such, not requiring a permanent ban, or even a ban off the mark at all to get a point across.

Is this gonna stay in this metaphorical limbo or are we gonna continue at all?