[DISCORD] Werewolf#4010 - Inviting and perpetuating drama

AnalWerewolf
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 9:16 am
Contact:

Re: [DISCORD] Werewolf#4010 - Inviting and perpetuating drama

Post by AnalWerewolf »

Guess I should finally get around to making a response to this.
HazelBailey wrote:
Mon Sep 23, 2019 9:36 am
Think Nicc covered my thoughts pretty well. I think Werewolf's behavior here was absolutely unacceptable for an admin to do. Bragging about a ban while not giving the correct details then baiting further arguing is something I wouldnt accept from a player. Much less another admin.
I wasn't bragging about a ban, I may have been misguided on how we handle bans and the privacy about them, I will admit to that. At the time I fully believed that stating a ban occurred was fine but not stating who was alright. I was going off of what I knew from past experience as I was never taught ANYTHING about what to do or how to act. I personally have spoken to BlackMajor and Izzy about this and apparently its a policy in place to see how people handle things on their own, which makes sense. However, this in no way was me bragging about a ban. When I have people in chat calling me secret police and saying that I am going to thanos snap people for voicing their opinions, pardon me for assuming taking a more transparent approach would be ideal. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/ ... b9f6b9.png
ForFoxSake wrote:
Mon Sep 23, 2019 10:53 am
All of my previous interactions with Werewolf have ended in exactly the same way here, no matter how hard I attempt to kind or agreeable, any kind of disagreement or request for better behaviour from him is immediately shot down with nonsensical excuses like "Imagine taking this so seriously."
Given the numerous times I myself, and Nik (as per his post) have attempted to talk to Werewolf about these issues (and even just assuming we're the only two to have ever attempted to do so - something I doubt is true), then I feel this thread at the very bottom line is going to have to be a major wakeup call to Werewolf that this kind of blasé attitude towards administration is not acceptable.

While writing the start of this post up, the full scale of this issue struck me. By acting the way he did, Werewolf has goaded other uses into harassing Feril from the mere accusation that he was defending the image.
I feel as though, had any regular user stirred up this level of drama against someone, they'd probably have eaten a discord server ban already.
It is definitely a wake up call alright, because I was never told that my attitude was unacceptable in any official manner by other staff, I've held this exact attitude for the six or so months before I was an admin and I continued to hold this same attitude afterwards. This is exactly how I act for the other servers that I moderate, not once has it been an issue except for now when all of a sudden staff come out of the woodwork to shit on me for it. Why wasn't this brought up to me earlier if it is such a big issue? I am all for change, but that cannot happen without conversation. Not once have I taken anything outside of administrative matters or discussion seriously, that's my whole gimmick and always has been, how you guys are suddenly saying this isn't acceptable is genuinely surprising. This is the internet, am I really meant to take an argument on the internet seriously? Previous to this complaint I didn't think so, but if that needs to change then I am all for it. No sweat off my back to do that.

As per your mention of trying to help me with Nik, I can say with out a doubt that neither of you two have ever tried to help me. I don't even know what you mean by help, but I can assure you that it either never happened, or there was an attempt that ended in a miscommunication of intent that I've forgotten about.

I never goaded any other uses to harass Feril, that's a mistake on their own part, I cannot control how others perceive someone's argument, hell, even I failed to understand what they were trying to argue and hopped aboard the 'Why is this guy defending CP?' bandwagon I guess you could say. But no, that was a miscommunication on their part that lead to me and several others not understanding their intents. I do understand now, but this is after much clarification.
SectoidDan wrote:
Mon Sep 23, 2019 1:55 pm
I think (or at least did think prior to this) that colloquially CP is pretty widely understood to mean actual photos or videos of actual children - the type of thing that gets Discord servers and lifeweb forums nuked. Not the kind of shit you joke about, especially as staff. Though this image was not that, it was still probably against Discord's ToS as far as I understand it so deleting it was the right or at least safe thing to do, but I'm aware that's not exactly the issue here.

As far as the actual complaint here, I have to agree with Nik's take on this, it's pretty poor form from an admin and I think there's a certain level of professionalism and respect towards other players that's expected of us as staff, even towards people being banned. Both of you should've taken your discussion to DMs if you wanted to continue it as soon as someone else asked you to - that a non-staff member had to nudge a staff member towards following the Discord rules is disheartening to see.
This image was indeed illegal, electronic media is covered under US law regarding CP content, as well as artistic renditions. But yeah no lets not open that can of worms here, this is all I am going to say on the topic.

If it is poor form why was I not told sooner? I've always had this sort of behavior online, I don't take most things online seriously, I mess around, shitpost, all that. As for the accusation of me not following rules, I genuinely don't see it, I'd argue it was close to Rule 1 and Rule 2, although I cannot precisely remember when another administrator stepped in, but if they did and I didn't follow it, I would agree that would fall under Rule 7.
Soulstolen wrote:
Wed Sep 25, 2019 10:24 am
I read through everything at least three times, and made sure to go over every picture as best I could in this scenario. Now let's start off by throwing aside the whole ordeal with whether it was "Truly CP or not" as this is not going to be apart of my argument in the slightest, I'll be talking about Werewolf's behavior in this.
Starting off with the very first initial picture, immidiately something is wrong here and that's the fact Wolf even decided to mention that they just banned someone. From personal experience bans are not public unless the person being banned decides to mention it, or said person was underage. Granted Wolf didn't state who was banned, they still should not take it so lightly and even give anyone else a chance to know that they were, especially since said person could have been founded out as "Oh so 'such-and-such' just got banned?" Stating you've just banned someone like that is a bit unprofessional and only sparks a match that could be a burning flame.
These three just bring me great disappointment, instead of trying to calm a situation down you meme? There's numerous other times within' the conversation you do the same thing, but these three spoke it all to me and honestly, this is the reason admins end up getting a bad rep, because they just show little professionalism and care for actual issues that either they, or someone else has caused. Copy pasting "admin man bad" because someone is trying to discuss something, three times for that matter. (They as in admins in general, not Wolf, however that was shown within' this conversation here by them.)
Now back to what I said earlier about people possibly being able to find out who it was that posted it? While this is not my main point, it can be quite misleading as a crude child cartoon doesn't equal to someone posting live tape of a man sexually assaulting a child. Not saying it wasn't bannable, but Wolf did decide to mention that someone was banned for CP, said person could have been found out, and possible attacked for something that in reality was not as harsh as depicted, in the end Wolf should never have said a word about anyone getting banned and this would not have been and issue. Second point is where they state, "Also I don't need to give context at all outside of administration matters." Well, if it was an administrative matter please tell me why it was mentioned in the first place? This is hypocritical, to mention something so drastic as someone being banned for CP, then to give zero context about the situation. Either nothing should have said at all, or clarification should have been given to the situation, preferably the former.
Another example of the unprofessionalism in this situation, being in a furry server and claiming numerous times they hate furries, joke or not, this was not the time, nor place to start saying things like that, why would we have an admin that is not okay with furries, this just makes people feel uncomfortable and possibly cold to ever asking Wolf for anything. Meanwhile, "mfw I cant ban child porn" and the very colorful amount of times :omegalul: has been used, this shows again, zero professionalism or care in a situation. No one said it wasn't bannable, all that was wanted was context on a situation, or again better yet, it not having been mentioned in the first place.
a perfect time to end the discussion and drop it, though it was not taken and instead were further pinged and messaged about the situation. I have a hard time coming to terms of why, why keep going? Ah yes, the third picture, "So tempting." My disappointment is immeasurable at this point in time.

Personal Experience
Since the day Wolf became an admin I've noticed harsh, unprofessionalism, and before they were even a full admin (Trial Admin) there was a situation with them regarding how they handed a situation, and just recently they have been talked down a few times because they get heated and start throwing insults and petty comments instead of asking one of us to handle the situation. I try to keep things professional here and may not be the most perfect when it comes to discussion with other admins, but when it comes to the playerbase, the sole reason we have adminship in the first place, we must keep calm and a level-head. This has not been shown recently, or in my eyes, since the day they were brought up.

For the longest time, they have shown unprofessionalism, a rough attitude towards those that disagree with them, and a lack of respect for other players. I will be blunt with saying I can't go on with supporting Werewolf being an admin anymore, however this is not even close to being my decision, but with a history that seems to have only gotten worse, my point will stand as is.
As I said in response to Hazel's post I was not at all aware that we were not allowed to state that a ban occurred or the reason. I apologize for that, I genuinely didn't know.

And yeah, of course I wasn't taking the argument seriously, I saw it as a non-issue hell I saw this entire thread as a non-issue until recently. Again, as I have said previously in this post, I do not take most things on the internet seriously. Yes it was unprofessional, but honestly there has never been a professional air about this server or the discord, It genuinely never crossed my mind at that moment that I should take anything said in the memes channel seriously.
Soulstolen wrote:
Wed Sep 25, 2019 10:24 am
Now back to what I said earlier about people possibly being able to find out who it was that posted it? While this is not my main point, it can be quite misleading as a crude child cartoon doesn't equal to someone posting live tape of a man sexually assaulting a child. Not saying it wasn't bannable, but Wolf did decide to mention that someone was banned for CP, said person could have been found out, and possible attacked for something that in reality was not as harsh as depicted, in the end Wolf should never have said a word about anyone getting banned and this would not have been and issue.
Right, I didn't consider that at the time, nor did I know it was something I shouldn't have done. I now see how that could have been used against the person banned in a harmful manner again, I am sorry for this.
Soulstolen wrote:
Wed Sep 25, 2019 10:24 am
Second point is where they state, "Also I don't need to give context at all outside of administration matters." Well, if it was an administrative matter please tell me why it was mentioned in the first place? This is hypocritical, to mention something so drastic as someone being banned for CP, then to give zero context about the situation. Either nothing should have said at all, or clarification should have been given to the situation, preferably the former.
I stated that because I did not believe it to be an administrative matter, again which is why I wasn't taking anything here seriously and did not see any need to provide more information about it. You're absolutely right it shouldn't have been brought up in the first place. The intent was to be more transparent but I understand now that I shouldn't have even mentioned it.
Soulstolen wrote:
Wed Sep 25, 2019 10:24 am
Another example of the unprofessionalism in this situation, being in a furry server and claiming numerous times they hate furries, joke or not, this was not the time, nor place to start saying things like that, why would we have an admin that is not okay with furries, this just makes people feel uncomfortable and possibly cold to ever asking Wolf for anything. Meanwhile, "mfw I cant ban child porn" and the very colorful amount of times :omegalul: has been used, this shows again, zero professionalism or care in a situation. No one said it wasn't bannable, all that was wanted was context on a situation, or again better yet, it not having been mentioned in the first place.
Yeah, again, I had no intent of being professional in the slightest in this situation as I have mentioned earlier, I also did not understand what Feril was trying to convey at the time, miscommunications suck but that's the reality of the internet. As for the 'I hate furries' comment, there is some truth to that but its mainly hyperbole for comedic and ironic effect, obviously I am a furry and I do enjoy the furry fandom it is just the people involved where I hold some reservations. I do have a distrust for furries based on past experiences but I understand not to let a loud minority of a group affect my interactions with the silent majority that are good people.
Soulstolen wrote:
Wed Sep 25, 2019 10:24 am
a perfect time to end the discussion and drop it, though it was not taken and instead were further pinged and messaged about the situation. I have a hard time coming to terms of why, why keep going? Ah yes, the third picture, "So tempting." My disappointment is immeasurable at this point in time.
I am sorry to disappoint, I genuinely did not see any problem with it at the time, my reasoning is above. Is arguing against the rules? Obviously when an admin tells you to stop, you stop. At the time I did know that I should have stopped but I didn't, again, my apologies, not much I can do about it now.
Soulstolen wrote:
Wed Sep 25, 2019 10:24 am
Personal Experience
Since the day Wolf became an admin I've noticed harsh, unprofessionalism, and before they were even a full admin (Trial Admin) there was a situation with them regarding how they handed a situation, and just recently they have been talked down a few times because they get heated and start throwing insults and petty comments instead of asking one of us to handle the situation. I try to keep things professional here and may not be the most perfect when it comes to discussion with other admins, but when it comes to the playerbase, the sole reason we have adminship in the first place, we must keep calm and a level-head. This has not been shown recently, or in my eyes, since the day they were brought up.

For the longest time, they have shown unprofessionalism, a rough attitude towards those that disagree with them, and a lack of respect for other players. I will be blunt with saying I can't go on with supporting Werewolf being an admin anymore, however this is not even close to being my decision, but with a history that seems to have only gotten worse, my point will stand as is.
See my issue here is that if this was an issue for you since back when I was a trialmin, why didn't you bring this up with the head admins or better yet directly to me? I find it immensely disappointing that rather than address an evident problem sooner it was left alone. I have always been crass, blunt, and an avid shitposter. This isn't a new thing, I have always acted like this. Also I do not know what you mean by 'talked down a few times' I rarely ever get heated, although as of late I understand I have gotten genuinely frustrated or angry, I am aware of that.

I don't know, I'm just baffled really, all of this from fellow admins has genuinely came out of nowhere, how can you harbor such feelings and not speak about them? I cannot understand it. I wasn't even going to reply to this topic because I genuinely did not and never thought this would be such an issue. I understand that me mentioning the ban was uncalled for and something I shouldn't do, and I now know now to do that, but everything else has never been an issue elsewhere. Hell on TG I earned that nickname 'based anal' because of my attitude and behavior, as well as positive notes.

I still don't see this as that big of a deal, sorry. If it is that big of a deal it should have been brought up to me personally. This is all just really quite sad to hear.

Nik707
Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 6:12 am

Re: [DISCORD] Werewolf#4010 - Inviting and perpetuating drama

Post by Nik707 »

>Why wasn't this brought up to me earlier if it is such a big issue? I am all for change, but that cannot happen without conversation.
Ahem, like the last two times we argued and I told you to cool it and you responded with the same 3 reasons as always? Or like the time literally just the other day in admin chat that I tried to tell you why you were constantly on the bad end of toeing the rules for acting like a dick that you vehemently denied? Yeah, I'll bring it up to you again if you want.

Weblure
Junior Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:08 pm
Contact:

Re: [DISCORD] Werewolf#4010 - Inviting and perpetuating drama

Post by Weblure »

Soulstolen's reply nicely sums up how I feel about the entire situation. I should make it clear that this is my first notable interaction with Werewolf; I haven't seen any other behavior, positive or negative, from them, so I don't really have any solid opinion on them as a moderator beyond this first impression. As such, I won't be for or against any action taken against them. My primary intention for this thread was to have a record of what took place, because I felt it to be extremely poor behavior for a moderator and wanted to know what the general consensus was. Thankfully, most people -- many of them moderators -- seemed to agree that what took place was unbecoming.

However, Werewolf's response brought some interesting things to light. What kind of training is given to new moderators? How much do moderators communicate with each other? Are moderators afraid of addressing the questionable behavior of other staff members? I strongly believe that consistency between moderators is important for a stable community. The fact that Werewolf had supposedly been allowed to behave this poorly ever since being a trial admin leads me to believe that it might be a good idea to set stronger guidelines for moderators, along with maintaining better communication about each other's behavior.

Unfortunately, none of this does much to excuse how Werewolf acted during that situation. All members are expected to be familiar with the rules; having a moderator blatantly ignoring those rules and/or toeing the line like that, and then claiming "well I didn't know any better" is downright idiotic. I get not taking the internet seriously, but as a moderator, you're expected to take your responsibility to the community seriously. If you're going to act like a dick to the community you're supposed to be moderating and setting bad examples for how people within that community should act, then honestly, why are you even a moderator?

AnalWerewolf wrote: I wasn't bragging about a ban, I may have been misguided on how we handle bans and the privacy about them, I will admit to that. At the time I fully believed that stating a ban occurred was fine but not stating who was alright. I was going off of what I knew from past experience as I was never taught ANYTHING about what to do or how to act. I personally have spoken to BlackMajor and Izzy about this and apparently its a policy in place to see how people handle things on their own, which makes sense. However, this in no way was me bragging about a ban. When I have people in chat calling me secret police and saying that I am going to thanos snap people for voicing their opinions, pardon me for assuming taking a more transparent approach would be ideal.
I agree that they weren't bragging, and they were asked to elaborate on what happened. However, their elaboration was a horrible over-exaggeration and did nothing to make the situation any less drama-inducing. Mistakes happen, I get it. But when people politely pointed out the issue to you, instead of acknowledging our concerns, you instead decided to behave like an arrogant manchild and treat us like we're idiots.

AnalWerewolf wrote: I never goaded any other uses to harass Feril, that's a mistake on their own part, I cannot control how others perceive someone's argument, hell, even I failed to understand what they were trying to argue and hopped aboard the 'Why is this guy defending CP?' bandwagon I guess you could say. But no, that was a miscommunication on their part that lead to me and several others not understanding their intents. I do understand now, but this is after much clarification.
Which leads me to this bullshit. You didn't know what I was talking about? Really?

I feel like I've made it pretty clear numerous times:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png

After ALL of that clarification, you still say something as idiotic as this:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png

Then I clarified AGAIN:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png

But hey, let's ignore everything they said and jump in on accusing them of defending child porn, haha I'm such an epic memer!!:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png

Either you're dogshit at comprehending English, or you knowingly continued to twist the subject to be about something else to make me look like a bad person. Either way, don't pull that "it's their fault for not being clear" shit. I've made it very clear since the beginning; any misunderstanding is entirely your fault.

AnalWerewolf wrote: This image was indeed illegal, electronic media is covered under US law regarding CP content, as well as artistic renditions. But yeah no lets not open that can of worms here, this is all I am going to say on the topic.
Again, the argument was never meant to be about whether or not it was legal; you're the one that brought legal technicality shit into a complaint about how you announced that child porn was posted in the server. Nobody fucking cares if it's "technically considered child porn lmaooooo!!". It's still fucked up to claim something that serious when you know as well as anyone else that there's a huge fucking difference.

AnalWerewolf
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 9:16 am
Contact:

Re: [DISCORD] Werewolf#4010 - Inviting and perpetuating drama

Post by AnalWerewolf »

Nik707 wrote:
Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:29 pm
>Why wasn't this brought up to me earlier if it is such a big issue? I am all for change, but that cannot happen without conversation.
Ahem, like the last two times we argued and I told you to cool it and you responded with the same 3 reasons as always? Or like the time literally just the other day in admin chat that I tried to tell you why you were constantly on the bad end of toeing the rules for acting like a dick that you vehemently denied? Yeah, I'll bring it up to you again if you want.
You mean the last two times we've argued and someone else told you to stop trying to antagonize me? That was when I just wanted to discuss the idea of a rebase with staff because I felt it wasn't being taken seriously, and you acted so appallingly and you threw around baseless accusations. Do you honestly expect me to take advice from you after that? Even if you brought it up to me in any serious, honest, calm manner, I'd still have reservations believing you after what you've pulled before, which you didn't do, by the way. Your replies to this thread have been nothing more than you perpetrating your grudge of which I don't even care about anymore.
Weblure wrote:
Thu Sep 26, 2019 2:46 pm
Soulstolen's reply nicely sums up how I feel about the entire situation. I should make it clear that this is my first notable interaction with Werewolf; I haven't seen any other behavior, positive or negative, from them, so I don't really have any solid opinion on them as a moderator beyond this first impression. As such, I won't be for or against any action taken against them. My primary intention for this thread was to have a record of what took place, because I felt it to be extremely poor behavior for a moderator and wanted to know what the general consensus was. Thankfully, most people -- many of them moderators -- seemed to agree that what took place was unbecoming.

However, Werewolf's response brought some interesting things to light. What kind of training is given to new moderators? How much do moderators communicate with each other? Are moderators afraid of addressing the questionable behavior of other staff members? I strongly believe that consistency between moderators is important for a stable community. The fact that Werewolf had supposedly been allowed to behave this poorly ever since being a trial admin leads me to believe that it might be a good idea to set stronger guidelines for moderators, along with maintaining better communication about each other's behavior.

Unfortunately, none of this does much to excuse how Werewolf acted during that situation. All members are expected to be familiar with the rules; having a moderator blatantly ignoring those rules and/or toeing the line like that, and then claiming "well I didn't know any better" is downright idiotic. I get not taking the internet seriously, but as a moderator, you're expected to take your responsibility to the community seriously. If you're going to act like a dick to the community you're supposed to be moderating and setting bad examples for how people within that community should act, then honestly, why are you even a moderator?

AnalWerewolf wrote: I wasn't bragging about a ban, I may have been misguided on how we handle bans and the privacy about them, I will admit to that. At the time I fully believed that stating a ban occurred was fine but not stating who was alright. I was going off of what I knew from past experience as I was never taught ANYTHING about what to do or how to act. I personally have spoken to BlackMajor and Izzy about this and apparently its a policy in place to see how people handle things on their own, which makes sense. However, this in no way was me bragging about a ban. When I have people in chat calling me secret police and saying that I am going to thanos snap people for voicing their opinions, pardon me for assuming taking a more transparent approach would be ideal.
I agree that they weren't bragging, and they were asked to elaborate on what happened. However, their elaboration was a horrible over-exaggeration and did nothing to make the situation any less drama-inducing. Mistakes happen, I get it. But when people politely pointed out the issue to you, instead of acknowledging our concerns, you instead decided to behave like an arrogant manchild and treat us like we're idiots.

AnalWerewolf wrote: I never goaded any other uses to harass Feril, that's a mistake on their own part, I cannot control how others perceive someone's argument, hell, even I failed to understand what they were trying to argue and hopped aboard the 'Why is this guy defending CP?' bandwagon I guess you could say. But no, that was a miscommunication on their part that lead to me and several others not understanding their intents. I do understand now, but this is after much clarification.
Which leads me to this bullshit. You didn't know what I was talking about? Really?

I feel like I've made it pretty clear numerous times:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png

After ALL of that clarification, you still say something as idiotic as this:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png

Then I clarified AGAIN:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png

But hey, let's ignore everything they said and jump in on accusing them of defending child porn, haha I'm such an epic memer!!:
https://media.discordapp.net/attachment ... nknown.png

Either you're dogshit at comprehending English, or you knowingly continued to twist the subject to be about something else to make me look like a bad person. Either way, don't pull that "it's their fault for not being clear" shit. I've made it very clear since the beginning; any misunderstanding is entirely your fault.

AnalWerewolf wrote: This image was indeed illegal, electronic media is covered under US law regarding CP content, as well as artistic renditions. But yeah no lets not open that can of worms here, this is all I am going to say on the topic.
Again, the argument was never meant to be about whether or not it was legal; you're the one that brought legal technicality shit into a complaint about how you announced that child porn was posted in the server. Nobody fucking cares if it's "technically considered child porn lmaooooo!!". It's still fucked up to claim something that serious when you know as well as anyone else that there's a huge fucking difference.
As I said, I wasn't taking anything anyone was saying as serious at the time. Had it been a serious discussion I'd have acknowledged your concerns and more. I don't think anyone at the time of the conversation knew exactly what you were talking about, look, that's fine, miscommunications happen, but don't go off on me yet again because there is no arguing that what happened there was a miscommunication, I had no idea what you were actually trying to convey and it is evident others didn't either nothing you say now will change what actually happened in the past. Also, no need to throw around insults, this is now a serious discussion. Throw insults around all you want in the #memes channel, not here.

See in a serious forum I will act just that, but in discord, in the shitpost channel I don't know what you guys were expecting.

Anyway I'm going to stop arguing the technicalities behind the post, I've reread the law many times by now and I can say without a doubt that what was posted was in fact Child Pornography and me saying it was that was correct, you can perceive the law any other way as you wish, in the end it doesn't matter to me as an Australian, or a Citadel Staff member as it should have been deleted anyway, so I won't continue to discuss it. Should I have said it? Nope, but I know that now.

I still think this is just one big miscommunication and lack of communication for the most part, but you and others have brought up things that are indeed needing of attention that I will try my best to address. It is now evident to me that my overly lax and 'shitposty' attitude is not one that is congruous with what is expected of staff let alone regular members of our community. I'll blame too much time spent around TG and equally less serious groups but a big part of it is my own personality, and I'll try to address it.

Nik707
Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 6:12 am

Re: [DISCORD] Werewolf#4010 - Inviting and perpetuating drama

Post by Nik707 »

You're saying I'm just perpetuating a grudge and yet so far everyone has echoed my thoughts in some manner, so what does that tell you? Perhaps, maybe, it's not a grudge?

AnalWerewolf
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 9:16 am
Contact:

Re: [DISCORD] Werewolf#4010 - Inviting and perpetuating drama

Post by AnalWerewolf »

Nik707 wrote:
Fri Sep 27, 2019 6:04 am
You're saying I'm just perpetuating a grudge and yet so far everyone has echoed my thoughts in some manner, so what does that tell you? Perhaps, maybe, it's not a grudge?
Point is that I don't give a shit about what you think. You have your own shitty history with myself and others. I will take anyone else's opinion seriously but yours.

Nik707
Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2018 6:12 am

Re: [DISCORD] Werewolf#4010 - Inviting and perpetuating drama

Post by Nik707 »

Lucky for you my opinion seems to be fairly ubiquitous among others here.

AnalWerewolf
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 9:16 am
Contact:

Re: [DISCORD] Werewolf#4010 - Inviting and perpetuating drama

Post by AnalWerewolf »

Nik707 wrote:
Fri Sep 27, 2019 9:57 am
Lucky for you my opinion seems to be fairly ubiquitous among others here.
Alright. Can you please stop being snarky and condescending? Take this seriously. This isn't the time or place to further whatever petty thing it is you have going, so please just stop. This is the last I'm going reply to you in the hopes of avoiding an argument.

Weblure
Junior Member
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2019 9:08 pm
Contact:

Re: [DISCORD] Werewolf#4010 - Inviting and perpetuating drama

Post by Weblure »

AnalWerewolf wrote:As I said, I wasn't taking anything anyone was saying as serious at the time. Had it been a serious discussion I'd have acknowledged your concerns and more. I don't think anyone at the time of the conversation knew exactly what you were talking about, look, that's fine, miscommunications happen, but don't go off on me yet again because there is no arguing that what happened there was a miscommunication, I had no idea what you were actually trying to convey and it is evident others didn't either nothing you say now will change what actually happened in the past.
It was a serious discussion. Me and another user were genuinely off-put by your misleading announcement and addressed it in a serious tone. Just because you happened to announce the ban in the #memes channel doesn't change anything. Our concerns were made very clear from the start. The only people that didn't understand what I was talking about were the ones that joined in later, whom obviously weren't following the conversation from the start, so all the context they had to go off of was you changing the subject to be about legal technicality. What I was trying to convey was made clear numerous times, as shown, and you can't honestly deny that.

The point is, if you somehow manage to be that oblivious when people are voicing a genuine concern to you, then you have some serious problems to work on, especially as a moderator.

AnalWerewolf wrote:Also, no need to throw around insults, this is now a serious discussion. Throw insults around all you want in the #memes channel, not here.
See in a serious forum I will act just that, but in discord, in the shitpost channel I don't know what you guys were expecting.
AnalWerewolf wrote:Point is that I don't give a shit about what you think. You have your own shitty history with myself and others. I will take anyone else's opinion seriously but yours.
Illusion 100

AnalWerewolf wrote:Anyway I'm going to stop arguing the technicalities behind the post, I've reread the law many times by now and I can say without a doubt that what was posted was in fact Child Pornography and me saying it was that was correct, you can perceive the law any other way as you wish, in the end it doesn't matter to me as an Australian, or a Citadel Staff member as it should have been deleted anyway, so I won't continue to discuss it. Should I have said it? Nope, but I know that now.
The fact that you somehow continue to miss the point is astonishing. Maybe it's different in Australia, but typically, there's a difference between legal definition and rational definition. For example, by ATF legal definition, a machine gun is any gun that fires more than one shot in a single trigger press. Of course, in reality, nobody goes around referring to double barreled pistols as machine guns. Very similar to how nobody goes around referring to a satire meme edit of a comic as child pornography.

AnalWerewolf wrote:I still think this is just one big miscommunication and lack of communication for the most part, but you and others have brought up things that are indeed needing of attention that I will try my best to address. It is now evident to me that my overly lax and 'shitposty' attitude is not one that is congruous with what is expected of staff let alone regular members of our community. I'll blame too much time spent around TG and equally less serious groups but a big part of it is my own personality, and I'll try to address it.
I'm glad that you plan to "try to address it", though I'd be more inclined to believe you if you'd stop making poor excuses, such as "it was all just one big misunderstanding" and continuing the whole "well I was technically correct" nonsense. If you're capable of acknowledging and improving from your mistakes, then we can all move on.

AnalWerewolf
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu May 16, 2019 9:16 am
Contact:

Re: [DISCORD] Werewolf#4010 - Inviting and perpetuating drama

Post by AnalWerewolf »

Weblure wrote:
Fri Sep 27, 2019 11:58 am
AnalWerewolf wrote:As I said, I wasn't taking anything anyone was saying as serious at the time. Had it been a serious discussion I'd have acknowledged your concerns and more. I don't think anyone at the time of the conversation knew exactly what you were talking about, look, that's fine, miscommunications happen, but don't go off on me yet again because there is no arguing that what happened there was a miscommunication, I had no idea what you were actually trying to convey and it is evident others didn't either nothing you say now will change what actually happened in the past.
It was a serious discussion. Me and another user were genuinely off-put by your misleading announcement and addressed it in a serious tone. Just because you happened to announce the ban in the #memes channel doesn't change anything. Our concerns were made very clear from the start. The only people that didn't understand what I was talking about were the ones that joined in later, whom obviously weren't following the conversation from the start, so all the context they had to go off of was you changing the subject to be about legal technicality. What I was trying to convey was made clear numerous times, as shown, and you can't honestly deny that.
I'm not even going to bother further arguing this, it happened in the past, no matter how serious you claim the conversation was, or how many people get it, that does not change the fact that when this took place I was not taking you seriously and neither were others. I don't care how many times you attempted to make yourself clear, that cannot change the past. Nothing you do will change what actually happened. I have given my side, I have given my evidence, take it or leave it. I have DMs from others who witnessed the conversation but did not intervene who also had no idea what you claim you were actually trying to convey.
Weblure wrote:
Fri Sep 27, 2019 11:58 am
The point is, if you somehow manage to be that oblivious when people are voicing a genuine concern to you, then you have some serious problems to work on, especially as a moderator.
Don't be so high and mighty, it was a miscommunication. This is evident because multiple people, involved or not in the initial argument, believe you were talking about something else entirely. Miscommunications happen, we're human.
Weblure wrote:
Fri Sep 27, 2019 11:58 am
AnalWerewolf wrote:Also, no need to throw around insults, this is now a serious discussion. Throw insults around all you want in the #memes channel, not here.
See in a serious forum I will act just that, but in discord, in the shitpost channel I don't know what you guys were expecting.
AnalWerewolf wrote:Point is that I don't give a shit about what you think. You have your own shitty history with myself and others. I will take anyone else's opinion seriously but yours.
Illusion 100
Bringing up past history with a person as a reason for my distrust is throwing around insults? Interesting. Or are you referring to my use of the word 'shit', because that's not an insult its an adjective applied to words used to describe our previous interactions. :V

Again, take this seriously. If you have an actual legitimate complaint, this is the place to talk about it, not meme about and throw accusations. Please, I am trying my best to be accommodating to whatever it is you'd like to discuss with me.
Weblure wrote:
Fri Sep 27, 2019 11:58 am
AnalWerewolf wrote:Anyway I'm going to stop arguing the technicalities behind the post, I've reread the law many times by now and I can say without a doubt that what was posted was in fact Child Pornography and me saying it was that was correct, you can perceive the law any other way as you wish, in the end it doesn't matter to me as an Australian, or a Citadel Staff member as it should have been deleted anyway, so I won't continue to discuss it. Should I have said it? Nope, but I know that now.
The fact that you somehow continue to miss the point is astonishing. Maybe it's different in Australia, but typically, there's a difference between legal definition and rational definition. For example, by ATF legal definition, a machine gun is any gun that fires more than one shot in a single trigger press. Of course, in reality, nobody goes around referring to double barreled pistols as machine guns. Very similar to how nobody goes around referring to a satire meme edit of a comic as child pornography.
Again, I am not going to argue this. I've said all that I need to, and I realize this conversation is futile.
Weblure wrote:
Fri Sep 27, 2019 11:58 am
AnalWerewolf wrote:I still think this is just one big miscommunication and lack of communication for the most part, but you and others have brought up things that are indeed needing of attention that I will try my best to address. It is now evident to me that my overly lax and 'shitposty' attitude is not one that is congruous with what is expected of staff let alone regular members of our community. I'll blame too much time spent around TG and equally less serious groups but a big part of it is my own personality, and I'll try to address it.
I'm glad that you plan to "try to address it", though I'd be more inclined to believe you if you'd stop making poor excuses, such as "it was all just one big misunderstanding" and continuing the whole "well I was technically correct" nonsense. If you're capable of acknowledging and improving from your mistakes, then we can all move on.
I've never said I was technically correct. My only use of that word was to describe the technicality of US law.
http://puu.sh/Emm8I/db51d79274.png
In fact, in searching through the posts in this thread for use of the word I've found about seven cases the word was used, six times of which the word was used by you. Hmm.

Also you seem to be dismissing me as if I was simply trying to pass the entire thing off as a misunderstanding, that's blatantly incorrect. I've acknowledged that my attitude was at fault and I've explained why I believe this was the case, I am sorry that you believe this to be me making excuses, I was simply trying to explain the reasoning behind my actions at the time.
It is now evident to me that my overly lax and 'shitposty' attitude is not one that is congruous with what is expected of staff let alone regular members of our community. I'll blame too much time spent around TG and equally less serious groups but a big part of it is my own personality, and I'll try to address it.
Above is where I specifically acknowledged that my attitude was unacceptable for this community.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests